COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTIC TECHNIQUES IN THE ORGANIZATION, HARMONIZATION, AND STANDARDIZATION OF MODERN PHARMACEUTICAL TERMINOLOGY
Keywords:
Computational linguistics, pharmaceutical terminology, semantic modeling, NLP, standardization, unification, multilingual healthcare communication, digital pharmacology, AI-based terminology, global healthcare interoperability.Abstract
This research explores the application of computational linguistic techniques in the organization, harmonization, and standardization of modern pharmaceutical terminology. With the continuous emergence of new drugs, treatment methods, and biomedical innovations, the linguistic landscape of pharmacology has become increasingly complex and multilingual. The study emphasizes the use of artificial intelligence, natural language processing (NLP), and semantic modeling to systematically analyze pharmaceutical texts, extract relevant terms, and unify their usage across different languages and regulatory frameworks. By integrating terminology with international standards such as WHO INN, ATC, and MedDRA, the approach ensures clarity, reduces ambiguity, and enhances interoperability in global healthcare systems. Additionally, dynamic computational models facilitate real-time updates of emerging terms, enabling accurate communication between researchers, clinicians, and regulatory agencies. The findings highlight that computer-based linguistic modeling not only strengthens the precision and consistency of pharmaceutical terminology but also contributes to improved patient safety, cross-border collaboration, and efficient digital healthcare management.References
Ahmed, S., & Kaur, R. (2020). Pharmaceutical Terminology and Standardization in Global Health Communication. Journal of Medical Informatics, 15(2), 45–52.
Petrov, A., & Ivanova, M. (2021). Challenges of Multilingual Pharmaceutical Terminology. Applied Linguistics and Medicine, 8(3), 112–120.
Smith, J., & Brown, P. (2022). Computational Linguistics in Pharmaceutical Research: From Data to Meaning. Linguistic Technologies Journal, 17(1), 60–75.
Bodenreider, O. (2021). The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): Integrating Biomedical Terminology. National Library of Medicine Technical Report.
Schriml, L. M., et al. (2023). Drug Ontology: A Formal Model of Drug Knowledge. Bioinformatics Journal, 39(5), 889–898.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). ATC/DDD Index 2023. Geneva: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. Geneva: WHO Press.
Miller, T., & Zhang, L. (2023). Standardization and Semantic Modeling of Medical Terminology in the Digital Age. International Journal of Computational Healthcare, 11(4), 203–218.
Li, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Machine Learning Approaches in the Evolution of Biomedical Terminology. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 22(2), 77–89.
Grabar, N., & Zweigenbaum, P. (2020). Automatic Processing of Biomedical Terminology: Recent Advances and Challenges. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 144–156.
Cimino, J. J. (2021). Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century. Methods of Information in Medicine, 60(3), 201–210.
Ceusters, W., & Smith, B. (2022). A Realism-Based Approach to the Evolution of Biomedical Ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 13(2), 59–72.
ISO/TC 215 (2023). Health Informatics – Vocabulary and Definitions. International Organization for Standardization.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2022). Guideline on Standard Terms for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Routes of Administration, and Containers. London: EMA Publications.
Hennig, C., & Kübler, S. (2024). Applications of Computational Linguistics in Biomedical Terminology Alignment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7(5), 221–236.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.