CRIME AND DELINQUENCY: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
Keywords:
philosophy of crime and criminality, dialectical unity of crime and criminality, whole and part, singular, particular and general.Abstract
The article analyzes the essence of the concepts of crime and criminality, their similarities and differences, causes of occurrence, as well as the negative impact on the development of society. The importance of philosophical analysis combined with legal, sociological, psychological and other approaches to crime and criminality in the past and present is emphasized. Definitions, rules and attitudes given by Uzbek and foreign scientists to issues related to crime and criminality are analyzed comparatively. It is noted that crime distinguished from individual crimes by its specificity: historical variability, social significance, legal nature, negative nature, systematic nature. It is emphasized that in current scientific research in the field of crime and criminality, there are confusions between these two concepts and it is necessary to pay attention to the issues of their elimination. The fact that the phenomenon of crime and criminality is in a dialectical relationship with other social relations in society, the role of social norms together with legal norms in their prevention and elimination is analyzed Also, the essence of the concepts of crime and criminality is revealed on examples with the use of philosophical categories of whole and part, singular, particular and general. At the end of the article are recommended suggestions and conclusions about crime and criminality.
References
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. -M; 1996. St. 14.
Copyright Code Republic of Kazakhstan - Astana; 2023. St. 10.
Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. -T; 2021. St. 14
Legal encyclopedia. U. Based on Tadzhikhanov's general editing. -T; 2001 year. 134 pages
. Criminology: Uchebnik / Pod ed. N. F. Kuznetsova, V. V. Luneeva. M., 2004. S. 90.
Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2021 year. 278 items.
Criminology / Pod ed. Dj. F. Shelly. SPb., 2003. S. 79-80.
Babichev D.S. Politiko pravovoe issledovanie filosofii prestupnosti: Dis... kand. walk science Ufa, 2004. 40 p.
. Aleksandrov A.I. Filosofiya zla i philosophia prestupnosti. SPb., 2013.
Hegel G.V.F. Scientific logic. SPb., 2002. 448 p.
Leps A. Philosophy of Hegel and prestupnost kak yavlenie suschnosti // Juridicheskie nauki i obrazovanie. 2012. No. 35. 167 str.
See: Criminology / Pod ed. I.I. Karpetsa, V.N. Kudryavtseva, N.F. Kuznetsova, A.B. Sakharova. M., 1976; Criminology / Pod ed. V.G. Zvirbulya, N.F. Kuznetsova, G.M. Minkovsky. M., 1979; Vermet M. Osnovnye problemy kriminologii / Per. s weng. M.: Progress, 1978; Kholyst B. Criminology. Basic problems / Per. s polsk. M., 1980 i dr.
Hegel G.V.F. Scientific logic. SPb., 2002. 448 p.
Kerimov D.A. The methodology is correct. 212 p.
Volt L.O. Sootnoshenie structure i elementov // Voprosy filosofii. 1963. No. 5. 45 p.
Kerimov D.A. The methodology is correct. 219 p.
Fischer K. Hegel: ego jizn, somnenia i ucheniya. M.; L., 1933. 390 p.
Neklyudov N.A. Ugolovnye statisticheskie etyudy. M., 2010. S. 5.
Hulsman L. Picnes. Perdue. Paris, 1982. R. 68.
