COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGIES OF REFUSAL IN ORAL DISCOURSE: A PRAGMATIC AND CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
refusal strategies; oral discourse; pragmatics; speech act theory; expressives; illocutionary force; cultural scenario; cross-cultural communication.Abstract
This article examines communicative strategies of refusal in oral discourse from a pragmatic and cross-cultural perspective. Drawing upon speech act theory, particularly the classifications proposed by John Austin and John Searle, refusal is analyzed as an expressive illocutionary act reflecting the speaker’s psychological and social stance. The study explores the interaction between illocutionary force, cultural scenarios, and discourse dynamics in Uzbek and English communicative contexts. The findings demonstrate that refusal strategies are shaped by sociocultural norms, politeness principles, and communicative intentions, highlighting the adaptive and integrative nature of discourse.
References
Austin, J. L. (1986). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1962)
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Searle, J. R. (1986). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1969)
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Mouton de Gruyter.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoy krug: Lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs. Peremena.
Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). New York: Newbury House.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
