THE PRAGMATICS OF HUMOR AND IRONY IN JOURNALISTIC DISCOURSE: A COMPARATIVE ENGLISH AND UZBEK ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Dillayeva Nafosat Abdullayevna Master’s Student (Year 1), Linguistics Termez State University

Keywords:

Pragmatics, humor, irony, journalistic discourse, implicature, English media, Uzbek media, cross-cultural communication

Abstract

This article investigates the pragmatic functions of humor and irony in journalistic discourse through a comparative analysis of English and Uzbek media texts. Drawing on established pragmatic theories, including Grice’s Cooperative Principle, Speech Act Theory, Relevance Theory, and contemporary research on verbal irony and humor, the study examines how humor and irony operate as communicative strategies in newspapers and online journalism. The analysis focuses on pragmatic markers, implicature, evaluative stance, and socio-cultural context. Findings indicate that while English journalistic discourse frequently employs overt irony and satire, especially in opinion columns and political commentary, Uzbek journalistic discourse tends to favor indirect humor and culturally grounded allusions. The differences are shaped by socio-political traditions, audience expectations, and media conventions. The study contributes to cross-cultural pragmatics and media linguistics by clarifying how pragmatic mechanisms function in distinct linguistic environments.

References

Grice, H. P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Academic Press, pp. 26–40. (pp. 30–34 used).

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–120. (pp. 98–105 used).

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, pp. 222–237. (pp. 222–230 used).

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua, 87(1–2), pp. 53–76. (pp. 7–12 referenced from reprint pagination).

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 125–140. (pp. 128–135 used).

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–76. (pp. 54–70 used).

Simpson, P. (2003). On the Discourse of Satire. John Benjamins, pp. 45–60. (pp. 45–52 used).

Dynel, M. (2014). “Irony, Deception and Humour.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(4), pp. 619–639. (pp. 620–625 used).

Gibbs, R. W. (2000). “Irony in Talk Among Friends.” Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), pp. 5–27. (pp. 10–15 used).

Partington, A. (2007). “Irony and Reversal of Evaluation.” Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), pp. 1547–1569. (pp. 1550–1558 used).

Baym, G. (2005). “The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism.” Political Communication, 22(3), pp. 259–276. (pp. 262–268 used).

Yusupov, U. (2012). Pragmatics of the Uzbek Language. Tashkent: Fan Publishing, pp. 88–105. (pp. 90–98 used).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Dillayeva Nafosat Abdullayevna. (2026). THE PRAGMATICS OF HUMOR AND IRONY IN JOURNALISTIC DISCOURSE: A COMPARATIVE ENGLISH AND UZBEK ANALYSIS. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 13(2), 935–939. Retrieved from https://www.eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/5181