IMPROVING ELECTRONIC METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT TO DEVELOP LOGICAL COMPETENCIES IN FUTURE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
Keywords:
Logical competence, primary education, pre-service teacher training, electronic methodological support, digital pedagogy, ICT integration, professional competence.Abstract
This article examines the improvement of electronic methodological support aimed at developing logical competencies in future primary school teachers. The study is grounded in internationally recognized frameworks of teacher professional competence, digital competence, and logical reasoning development, including UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (2018), the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu), and research on logical thinking in teacher education. The article analyzes the structure of logical competence, the didactic potential of electronic educational resources, and the pedagogical conditions necessary for their effective integration into teacher training programs. Based on a systematic review of scientific literature and normative documents, the study identifies methodological principles for designing electronic resources that foster logical reasoning, analytical thinking, and problem-solving skills among pre-service teachers.
References
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp. 1–22. (Information used from p. 45–48).
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful Teacher Education. Jossey-Bass. (Information used from pp. 18–29).
UNESCO. (2018). ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO. (Information used from pp. 11–14).
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. (Information used from pp. 22–45).
Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press. (Information used from pp. 33–38).
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Viking Press. (Information used from pp. 91–97).
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. Educational Technology Publications. (Information used from pp. 59–63).
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. (Information used from pp. 74–76).
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp. 1017–1054. (Information used from p. 1029).
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. (Information used from pp. 102–108).
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), pp. 347–364. (Information used from p. 350).
European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Brussels. (Information used from pp. 15–21).






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo