THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTUAL FRAME THEORY IN LINGUOCULTURAL RESEARCH

Akhadova Nilufar Fazliddin kizi

Authors

Akhadova Nilufar Fazliddin kizi Independent Researcher, Uzbekistan State World Languages University Teacher, English Department “Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers” National Researche University

Keywords:

Conceptual Frame Theory, cognitive linguistics, linguocultural research, frame analysis, intercultural communication, conceptualization

Abstract

Conceptual Frame Theory (CFT) provides a framework for understanding how humans structure knowledge and interpret experiences through culturally embedded mental schemas. This study investigates the content, structure, and cultural significance of conceptual frames in English and Uzbek, focusing on key concepts such as freedom, family, hospitality, respect, success, and childhood. A multi-method approach was employed, combining cognitive-conceptual analysis, discourse analysis, corpus-based investigation, and digital linguocultural analysis.

References

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goddard, C. (2006). Cross-linguistic Semantics: Reflections on Universal Grammar and Linguistic Diversity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.-J. (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.

Narasimhan, B. (2014). Conceptual frames and cultural cognition in multilingual discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 69, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.001

Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.