FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH MAXILLARY SINUS CYSTS
Keywords:
maxillary sinus cyst, functional examination, rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow, SNOT-22, olfaction, saccharin test, nasal obstruction, sinonasal function.Abstract
Background: Maxillary sinus cysts are common radiologic findings, but only a subset of lesions is associated with clinically meaningful sinonasal dysfunction. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of functional examination methods in 120 patients with maxillary sinus cysts and to identify the most informative battery for clinical assessment and treatment planning. Methods: This modeled clinical study included 120 patients with CT- or CBCT-confirmed maxillary sinus cysts. Functional assessment consisted of visual analogue scale scoring, SNOT-22, peak nasal inspiratory flow, active anterior rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, psychophysical smell testing, saccharin transit time, and nasal endoscopy. Results: Mean VAS scores were 4.8 ± 2.1 for nasal obstruction, 4.1 ± 2.0 for facial pressure, and 3.2 ± 2.3 for smell disturbance. Mean SNOT-22 was 34.6 ± 15.8, mean PNIF was 95.7 ± 22.4 L/min, and mean bilateral rhinomanometric resistance was 0.34 ± 0.09 Pa/cm³/s. Symptomatic patients demonstrated significantly worse SNOT-22, lower PNIF, higher resistance, smaller minimal cross-sectional area, longer saccharin transit time, and more frequent olfactory dysfunction than minimally symptomatic patients. Conclusion: Functional evaluation of maxillary sinus cysts should be multimodal. The most informative core battery combines symptom scores, SNOT-22, PNIF, smell testing, and endoscopic correlation, with rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, and mucociliary clearance testing used selectively.
References
Dogan ME, Uluisik N, Yuvarlakbas SD. Retrospective analysis of pathological changes in the maxillary sinus with CBCT. Sci Rep. 2024;14:15529.
Rot P, Krzywdzinska S, Rozbicki P, et al. Prevalence of maxillary sinus cysts incidentally detected on MRI among a non-symptomatic population. J Clin Med. 2025;14(19):6756.
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology Suppl. 2020;29:1-464.
Ottaviano G, Pendolino AL, Nardello E, et al. Nasal patency measurement: state of the art of acoustic rhinometry. Facial Plast Surg. 2024.
Patil N, et al. Rhinomanometry: a comprehensive review of its applications and advancements in rhinology practice. Cureus. 2024;16:e62384.
Hernandez AK, Uhl C, Haehner A, et al. Objective nasal airflow measures in relation to subjective nasal obstruction, trigeminal function, and olfaction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2024;62(4):394-402.
Desrosiers M, et al. Peak nasal inspiratory flow and the association with nasal obstruction in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis. Adv Ther. 2025.
Zhu H, et al. Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of olfactory dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis. Mil Med Res. 2025;12:53.
Plath M, et al. Normative data for interpreting the SNOT-22. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023;43(6):521-529.
Maharani I, et al. The saccharin test in chronic rhinosinusitis. ORLI. 2025;55(1):14-18.
Lou Z. Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(Suppl 5):S112-S118.
Somayaji K, et al. A literature review of the maxillary sinus with emphasis on anatomy and






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo