INCREASED STROKE RISK IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION

Authors

  • Djamilova Jamila Sattorovna Department of Preclinical Sciences of the Asia International University. Bukhara, Uzbekistan.

Keywords:

stroke, hypertension, cardiovascular, prevention, brain,

Abstract

Arterial hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular conditions worldwide and remains the leading modifiable risk factor for stroke. Prolonged high blood pressure causes both structural and functional changes in the brain’s blood vessels, significantly raising the likelihood of a cerebrovascular event. According to the INTERSTROKE study, hypertension accounts for approximately 48% of the population-attributable risk of stroke globally. This article explores the pathophysiological link between hypertension and stroke, highlights key risk factors, and emphasizes the critical role of prevention strategies.

References

1.2022 World Hypertension League, Resolve To Save Lives and International Society of Hypertension dietary sodium (salt) global call to action. Campbell NR, Whelton PK, Orias M, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37:428–437. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00690-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2.Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:913–924. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3.Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, et al. Lancet. 2016;387:957–967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4.Prevention of stroke: a global perspective. Pandian JD, Gall SL, Kate MP, et al. Lancet. 2018;392:1269–1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31269-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5.Age-specific associations between systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular mortality. Jung MH, Yi SW, An SJ, Yi JJ. Heart. 2019;105:1070–1077. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. BMJ. 2021;372:0. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7.Integrating the framing of clinical questions via PICO into the retrieval of medical literature for systematic reviews. Scells H, Zuccon G, Koopman B, Deacon A, Azzopardi L, Geva S. In CIKM 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 2017:2291–2294. [Google Scholar]

8.Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: a methodological systematic review. Igelström E, Campbell M, Craig P, Katikireddi SV. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;140:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9.Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies. Hootman JM, Driban JB, Sitler MR, Harris KP, Cattano NM. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2:110–118. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10.Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias. Hayashino Y, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. J Epidemiol. 2005;15:235–243. doi: 10.2188/jea.15.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11.Potassium and health. Weaver CM. Adv Nutr. 2013;4:368–377. doi: 10.3945/an.112.003533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12.Pregnancy-associated stroke. Sanders BD, Davis MG, Holley SL, Phillippi JC. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63:23–32. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Published

2026-04-16

How to Cite

Djamilova Jamila Sattorovna. (2026). INCREASED STROKE RISK IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 13(4), 1186–1188. Retrieved from https://www.eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/6145