SPIRITUAL-EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AS A SUBJECT OF PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL
Keywords:
emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, spiritual-emotional intelligence, pedagogy, literary education, moral development, value-based education.Abstract
Modern education increasingly prioritizes not only cognitive development but also the formation of learners’ emotional, moral, and value-oriented capacities (UNESCO, 2021). In this context, the concepts of emotional intelligence and spiritual intelligence have become significant interdisciplinary constructs in psychology and pedagogy (Mayer et al., 2000; Goleman, 1995; Zohar & Marshall, 2000). However, these categories are often studied separately, which limits the development of holistic educational models aimed at the integrated formation of personality. This article conceptualizes spiritual-emotional intelligence (SEI) as an integrative pedagogical construct that combines emotional responsiveness, value-based reflection, moral reasoning, and personal meaning-making. The study aims to analyze the theoretical foundations of emotional and spiritual intelligence, identify their pedagogical interrelation, and substantiate the relevance of spiritual-emotional intelligence within literary education (Navruzova, 2021). Using theoretical analysis, comparative synthesis, and pedagogical interpretation of psychological concepts, the article demonstrates that literary education provides unique opportunities for developing students’ capacity for emotionally meaningful engagement with literary texts, moral reflection, and spiritual comprehension (Vygotsky, 1978; Rosenblatt, 1978). The findings indicate that SEI can be considered a significant educational outcome that supports students’ moral development, empathy, and reflective competence. The study concludes that integrating emotional and spiritual dimensions into pedagogical methodology offers a promising framework for contemporary educational practice.
References
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104.
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2011). Emotional intelligence: Implications for personal, social, academic, and workplace success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 88–103.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Lyusin, D. V. (2006). Emotional intelligence as a mixed construct: Its relation to personality and cognitive ability. In D. V. Ushakov & D. V. Lyusin (Eds.), Social intelligence: Theory, measurement, research (pp. 29–36). Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Emotional intelligence as zeitgeist, as personality, and as a mental ability. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 92–117). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Navruzova, E.P. (2021). Development of spiritual-emotional intelligence of schoolchildren in literature lessons. Science and Education Today, 10(69), 58–60. https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=284283
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wigglesworth, C. (2012). SQ21: The twenty-one skills of spiritual intelligence. New York, NY: SelectBooks.
Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2000). SQ: Spiritual intelligence, the ultimate intelligence. London, England: Bloomsbury






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo