NEUROLINGUISTIC CHALLENGES FOR LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES
Keywords:
neurolinguistics, neuroplasticity, language acquisition, cognitive barriers, working memory, linguistic interference.Abstract
The acquisition of a foreign language is a complex cognitive endeavor that relies heavily on the brain's neurobiological adaptability and cognitive resources. This study aims to identify and analyze the primary neurolinguistic challenges encountered by adult learners in second language acquisition. Using a systematic review of neurolinguistic frameworks and comparative analysis, the research investigates the biological constraints of the aging brain. The results indicate that the most significant hurdles stem from diminished neuroplasticity, the functional gap between declarative and procedural memory systems, and negative linguistic interference from the native language (L1). Specifically, the findings highlight how limitations in working memory capacity create a "bottleneck" effect, hindering the automation of new phonetic and syntactic structures. In the discussion, the study evaluates pedagogical strategies, such as the Neurolinguistic Approach (NLA), which prioritize the development of implicit "internal grammar" to bypass these cognitive barriers. The study concludes that aligning language teaching methodologies with the brain's cognitive architecture can significantly enhance proficiency outcomes. These findings emphasize the necessity of integrating neurophysiological insights into modern curriculum design.
References
Abutalebi J. Neural aspects of second language representation and language control // Acta Psychologica. – 2008. – Vol. 128. – No. 3. – Pp. 466-478.
Abutalebi J., Green D.W. Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control // Journal of Neurolinguistics. – 2007. – Vol. 20. – No. 3. – Pp. 242-275.
Baddeley A. Working memory and language: An overview // Journal of Communication Disorders. – 2003. – Vol. 36. – No. 3. – Pp. 189-208.
Birdsong D. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. – Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. – 194 p.
Germain C., Netten J. A New Paradigm for the Learning of a Second or Foreign Language: The Neurolinguistic Approach // Neuropsycholinguistics. – 2012. – Pp. 1-10.
Green D.W. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system // Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. – 1998. – Vol. 1. – No. 1. – Pp. 67-81.
Kuhl P.K. Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. – 2004. – Vol. 5. – No. 11. – Pp. 831-843.
Lenneberg E.H. Biological Foundations of Language. – New York: Wiley, 1967. – 489 p.
Morgan-Short K., et al. Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition // Language Learning. – 2012. – Vol. 62. – No. 4. – Pp. 1192-1210.
Morgan-Short K., et al. Language exposure and brain-wave patterns in adult L2 learners // PLOS ONE. – 2012. – Vol. 7. – No. 5. – e37335.
Paradis M. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2004. – 299 p.
Paradis M. Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Language. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2009. – 220 p.
Robinson P. Aptitude and second language acquisition // Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. – 2005. – Vol. 25. – Pp. 46-73.
Schlegel A.A., et al. White matter structure changes as adults learn a second language // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. – 2012. – Vol. 24. – No. 12. – Pp. 2322-2327.
Skehan P. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. – 338 p.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo