GLOBAL EDUCATIONAL REFORMS AND LOCAL PEDAGOGICAL HERITAGE: SEARCHING FOR BALANCE

Rahimova Dildora Kadirjonovna

Authors

Rahimova Dildora Kadirjonovna Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Business and Science

Keywords:

global education reforms, local pedagogical heritage, balance model, education globalization, pedagogical imperialism, cultural identity, reform sustainability, Uzbekistan education, national values, comparative pedagogy.

Abstract

This article presents a multi-dimensional scientific analysis of the relationship between global education reforms and local pedagogical heritage. The process of globalization directly influences national education systems, creating the need to adapt them to international standards and new pedagogical paradigms. At the same time, the national pedagogical heritage-the philosophy of education, the value system, the teacher-student tradition, and the idea of holistic human development, formed over centuries-constitutes a profound foundation that cannot be replaced by the contemporary educational process. Using Uzbekistan as an example, relevant aspects and practical directions of this process are recommended.

References

Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as Cultural Imperialism. Longman.-P. 17–44.

Hattie, J. (2015). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. Routledge.-P. 88–107.

Marginson, S. (2014). Higher Education and the Common Good. Melbourne University Press.-P. 201–218.

Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2000). The World Institutionalization of Education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse Formation in Comparative Education (pp. 111–132). Peter Lang.-P. 114–121.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press.-P. 47–68.

Robertson, R. (2012). Globalisation or Glocalisation? The Journal of International Communication, 18(2), 191–208.-P. 194–199.

Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish Lessons 3.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press.-P. 33–57.

Silova, I. (2009). From Sites of Occupation to Symbols of Multiculturalism: Reconceptualizing Minority Education in Post-Soviet Latvia. Information Age Publishing.-P. 88–102.

Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.). (2012). World Yearbook of Education 2012: Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education. Routledge.-P. 3–17.

Tikly, L. (2004). Education and the New Imperialism. Comparative Education, 40(2), 173–198.-P. 175–183.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO Publishing.-P. 56–74.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022 yil 28 yanvardagi «Yangi O‘zbekiston» taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risidagi PF-60-son Farmoni. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonun hujjatlari milliy bazasi.-4-bob.

Xolmatova, S. T. (2021). O‘zbekiston ta’lim tizimida global va mahalliy elementlarning nisbati: empirik tahlil. Pedagogika fanlari jurnali, 7(2), 19–33.-B. 21–27.

Mirzayev, F. R. (2022). Milliy pedagogik meros va zamonaviy ta’lim paradigmasi: integratsiya imkoniyatlari. Uzluksiz ta’lim, 4(3), 44–59.-B. 46–52.

OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.-P. 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en