CURRENT ISSUES IN IMPROVING THE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM IN PRIMARY EDUCATION

Gulmonova Guli Anvar qizi

Authors

Gulmonova Guli Anvar qizi 1st-year student of the Primary Education Department Faculty of Primary and Preschool Education Chirchik State Pedagogical University

Keywords:

primary education, assessment system, formative assessment, summative assessment, quality of education, assessment criteria, learning activity, competency-based approach

Abstract

This article analyzes the current issues of improving the assessment system in primary education.It highlights the shortcomings of traditional assessment methods and their impact on the quality of education. In addition, the importance of modern approaches, including formative and summative assessment, is discussed.The necessity of using clear criteria and taking into account students’ individual characteristics in the assessment process is substantiated.The results of the study contribute to the effective organization and improvement of the assessment system.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6–11.

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14

OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing. 10.UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. Paris: UNESCO

Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London: SAGE Publications.

Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. 14.Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27–31.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

Ozodqulov, O. B. o‘g‘li. (2025). The impact of play on psychic development in preschool age. Экономика и социум, 10(137). https://www.iupr.ru/_files/ugd/b06fdc_3f8acde372164076901c21e251f5751f.pdf

Kobilova, S. K., Eshnaev, N. J., Rakhmanova, D. U., Murtozakulov, Z. M. U., Turakulov, B. N., Ozodkulov, O. B. U., & Azimova, D. D. (2025). The role of virtual and augmented reality in enhancing scientific literacy in secondary education to support sustainable development goals (SDGs). Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Issue on 2nd BPNIC2025, 57–67. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue_BPN%202025/BPN_2025%2008.pdf